Language Science 1 | What is Language?

33

- Hello. I'm Julian Northbrook from doing DoingEnglish.com.

Here's an interesting question for you.

What is language exactly?

(upbeat music)

You would think this would be a fairly straightforward

and simple question to answer but far from it.

It is actually quite difficult to say

what exactly a language is.

So here in this video, I want to give you the definition

that language scientists have come up with.

In the 1960s, the linguist Charles F. Hockett came up

with a set of features that characterise human language.

I say, human language because although animals

do have language it's clearly not the same

as the language, that we as human beings, produce.

I'll make a separate video another day

all about animal language.

For us here battling with the question of: What is language?

Hockett's features are a great starting point.

Originally, there were 13 of these

language characterising features.

However, arguably some of them actually

aren't necessary for language.

For example, speaking and listening.

Although we generally think of language

as being something that is spoken,

something that you listen to

and understand with your ear,

people who are deaf and dumb use sign language

and that is just as much language as the spoken equivalent.

So, speaking and listening actually are not necessary

for a language to be language.

The first feature of language is that

language must always communicate meaning.

When I say something, when I gesture something

my intention is always to communicate

some kind of meaning to the comprehender.

This much is fairly obvious and fairly simple to understand.

Second, language itself is actually completely arbitrary.

What we mean by this is that the words that we use

to convey a certain meaning is

simply a symbol that does nothing to tell us

about the actual thing we are talking about.

For example, the word book does nothing

to describe the physical properties of a book

and it's no better than the word "hon"

the Japanese equivalent of book.

"Hon", book, either way it does nothing

to tell us about what this actually is.

I could call this object a "blingle-bopper"

and although nobody would actually understand me

it is just as good of a symbol as book or "hon".

Hm, see what I did there?

Third, the sounds of any language

must fit into a limited number of distinct categories.

This number will be different depending

on what language we're talking about.

But for example English has 44 phonemes.

Japanese has 46. Some languages have far more.

Some languages have far less but the point is,

no language can ever have an unlimited number of sounds.

Next, and perhaps most importantly, language must be able

to convey information about things or events

that take place outside of the current space and time.

This is important because monkeys for example,

can make different calls for different kinds of predators.

If they see a predator coming from the air,

they will make one kind of call.

A predator coming from the ground

will elicit a different kind of call.

These monkeys, however, cannot convey information

about these predators when the predators are not present.

Human languages can.

Human languages can talk about things that are not currently

present or did not take place this exact point in time.

Finally, in order to be a language it must be generative.

And this means that a limited number of units,

whether words, chunks, phrases, rules,

expressions, or what have you, are able

to combine to produce an unlimited number of sentences.

Now this is a great start.

These features do a wonderful job of categorising

and defining language in a scientific manner.

However, in my opinion they do very little

to get to the core of the problem,

the heart of the question of what language is.

Language, in my opinion, is far more than just a tool

that we use to communicate meanings and ideas.

Language is much deeper than that.

Language is fundamental to what it means to be human.

It is core to our very existence.

Could you imagine life without language for example?

Probably you can't.

That there is my criticism of academia in general.

Whilst academia has to be precise in order

to progress scientific knowledge

it often does so at the expense

of practicality and real-world usefulness.

So in my book, Master English Fast,

in chapter 3: Language Learning 101,

I give my own personal definition of what language is

and why that matters to you as the language learner.

Of course in this book we also go step-by-step

through the process of improving your English and speaking.

Not just language as defined by language scientists

but extraordinarily good language

that is useful in the real-world.

To get a copy of my book just

head over to MasterEnglishFAST.com.

I'll see you on the other side.

Before I go, go ahead leave a comment

tell us in the comments,

what do you believe to be the most important

defining aspect of language?

Tell us in the comments. I wanna hear,

and I'm sure everybody else does as well.

Of course, if you're new to this channel

go ahead and subscribe.

If you liked this video, give it a thumbs up

and if you hated it, go ahead (rock music)

and bash that thumbs down button.

and bash that thumbs down button.